MQA: the end of a weird idea which solved a non existing problem
|
07-04-2023, 12:17
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2023 12:21 by lyapounov.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
MQA: the end of a weird idea which solved a non existing problem
I always thought MQA was a very bad idea.
I could even say it was some sort of crookery, as it was not clear if it was truely lossless. They pretend it was, but some reverse engineering showed it was not (cf. https://goldensound.audio/2021/11/29/tid...-lossless/) Tidal used it, but Qobuz never. Well, it looks now like the end of it: https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-is-goi...nistration |
|||
07-04-2023, 14:39
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2023 14:40 by Peter@57m.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: MQA: the end of a weird idea which solved a non existing problem
I can only hope they don’t come out of administration
Thanks for the link |
|||
08-04-2023, 20:35
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: MQA: the end of a weird idea which solved a non existing problem
Sadly they might find a buyer who smells all that licensing money AND is gullible enough to drink up the MQA "cool-aid"
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)