Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
|
29-03-2020, 23:05
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
Aarrgghh! Another option if you will humour me.
Can the #Audio... ‘tags’ be exposed for comparison in the TagUpdate process? (But not for alteration) We could then create new personal tags with our preferred layout. Eg. @#AUDIODATA=16/44100 +USERAUDIO=44.1kHz 16bit Or @#AUDIODATA=24/96000 &#AUDIOCHANNELS=5.1 +USERAUDIO=96kHz 24bit 6ch etc. |
|||
29-03-2020, 23:20
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
Thanks for this suggestion. It is a good idea but not easy to implement given the way things currently work. I will give it some thought.
|
|||
30-03-2020, 00:04
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer | |||
01-04-2020, 11:40
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2020 11:40 by paultaylor.)
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
FYI for those using SongKong with MinimServer, there are two options on the *Format* tab that can be used to include audio information to the album title that you may find useful.
- Add Audio Format to album title - Add [HD] to album title for High Definition albums |
|||
08-04-2020, 11:37
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
The changes are now available in MinimServer 2 update 155 and are also included in the new 2.0.9 release for Synology. They include the ability to use #AudioData etc. in tag update files (@ and & lines only).
|
|||
09-04-2020, 15:03
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
Looks good! Many thanks
|
|||
09-04-2020, 15:33
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Audio quality information shown by MinimServer
(08-04-2020 11:37)simoncn Wrote: The changes are now available in MinimServer 2 update 155 and are also included in the new 2.0.9 release for Synology. They include the ability to use #AudioData etc. in tag update files (@ and & lines only). I am happy that you were able to act on my suggestion. That solution should satisfy everyone. Brilliant. Thanks. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)