|
Folk vs (80)Folk
|
|
19-06-2014, 05:23
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Folk vs (80)Folk
(18-06-2014 21:56)adrian Wrote: I am completely confused about what is going on. The problem is mp3 files. They appear to have ID3v2.4 tags. I'm working under Linux and tried id3, id3v2, and id3tool and none of them find the tag. The eyeD3 program and easy tag (like puddletag) show the tags but don't give any indication that there is a numerical id, nor do they give any indication that the "(80)Folk" files are any different from the "Folk" files. The only way I have found to tell the files apart is to use MinimServer. For ID3v2.4, the (80) genre notation is no longer valid. It seems that the tagging program that wrote the ID3v2.4 tags isn't aware of this difference between ID3v2.3 and ID3v2.4. Here is the relevant extract from the ID3v2.4 spec: TCON The 'Content type', which ID3v1 was stored as a one byte numeric value only, is now a string. You may use one or several of the ID3v1 types as numerical strings, or, since the category list would be impossible to maintain with accurate and up to date categories, define your own. Example: "21" $00 "Eurodisco" $00 |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Folk vs (80)Folk - adrian - 18-06-2014, 12:43
RE: Folk vs (80)Folk - simoncn - 18-06-2014, 16:16
RE: Folk vs (80)Folk - adrian - 18-06-2014, 21:56
RE: Folk vs (80)Folk - simoncn - 19-06-2014 05:23
RE: Folk vs (80)Folk - adrian - 19-06-2014, 13:20
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



