Linn Kazoo

[DavidHB]

(22-05-2014 15:40)simoncn Wrote:  I don't think it is correct to describe ohMedia as a standard. It is a specification written by Linn. In contrast, both the UPnP AV and DLNA (note: spelling) specifications have been developed by industry bodies with broad membership from many companies in the audio industry and are widely implemented.

It is probably of little use to get into a discussion as to what constitutes a standard; we can simply note that, on its website, ohMedia claims to be one, and that fact is itself of interest. That said, I agree with the essence of your point; standard or not, it can't be much of one when it is trumped by two more widely used (and unquestionable) standards, and when important parts of what is claimed to be an open standard are not even published.

One does wonder why Linn has gone down this path, which seems to lead only to a dead end - their well-known innate cussedness, perhaps?

(22-05-2014 15:40)simoncn Wrote:  It is also relevant to this discussion that the protocol used by Kazoo to communicate with Kazoo Server is not (yet?) a published part of the ohMedia specification and therefore cannot be implemented by anyone except Linn.

I'm sorry that I had not joined up the dots on this one. I realise now that you are referring to your exchange on the Linn forum with Linn staff, who seemed very ready to provide documentation, but have not done so.

Quote:As you can see from the combination of MinimServer and BubbleUPnP/BubbleDS (for example), the ability to provide good suppport for classical music isn't determined by whether ohMedia or UPnP/DLNA is used, but rather by the flexibility of the server and the control point.

Indeed. But my point (perhaps badly expressed) was that I was trying to see whether the new path on which Linn seemed to be striking out would produce useful results; Linn's product history is full of new ideas that seemed crazy at the time but actually came good. A number of these crazy ideas turned out to be game changers. I think we now know enough to realise that the Kazoo CP/server combination is not one of those.

Quote:There is no chance at the present time that MinimServer could implement this protocol because it isn't published (see above). If and when it is published, I will look at it and decide whether it makes sense for MinimServer to implement it in addition to MinimServer's current support for UPnP Search. Linn have said that support for UPnP Search is an objective for a future release of Kazoo, so perhaps a better solution would be for Linn to add this support.

Now I understand better how things are, I cannot but agree with you.

(22-05-2014 18:32)bbrip Wrote:  I would totally agree that it makes little sense to implement a non-standard search protocol just because Linn felt they had to invent one

Quite so. The more interesting question is why Linn (who are a generally profitable company, with a track record of unorthodox but often successful marketing) should feel this need. My own guess, for what it is worth, is that Linn's highest priority is to provide a software suite that its dealer network can easily use and install for customers; the 'open systems' features seem to be a secondary consideration.

It is easy to understand why companies like Linn, Naim and Lumin do not wish to tie themselves into the DLNA (sorry about previous mis-spellings) franchise, because for such companies that option is both expensive and constraining. But that makes it all the more important that they should do more with UPnP AV. The ohMedia shortcut which Linn is attempting hasn't worked so far, and shows no signs of succeeding in future.

Quote:Those resources might have been better allocated putting out a top notch control point.

Well, yes, but that begs the question as to what would constitute 'top-notch' . As MinimServer users, I think that we might be able to agree on that, but the fact that we are (presumably) prepared to work on our metadata and make extensive use of MinimServer's capabilities may well place us in a minority among the target market for network players. Most people want a package that is easy to set up, and don't want to be bothered with technicalities. For such people, the Kazoo software makes some sense. It makes no sense to me, because, second only to listening to the music, dealing with the data is what I enjoy most about this hobby.

David