|
Network absolute path
|
|
15-01-2016, 11:00
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Network absolute path
(15-01-2016 10:34)DavidL Wrote: OK Simon, I understand. Why is rescanning so slow on a NAS? The read heads have to do the same work traversing the platters, for a given disc capacity. Is it a result of having RAID on the NAS, or indexing giving a more rapid search on a USB disc? I've setup indexing on my Synology DS412+ but not noticed any reduction in rescanning times. Rescanning on a NAS isn't slow if MinimServer is running on the same NAS, so it isn't related to RAID. I think it is probably caused by the way Java's support for scanning a directory tree interacts with the SMB/CIFS protocol for accessing a remote network disk. I have looked at the network messages that are exchanged during scanning but my knowledge of the SMB/CIFS protocol wasn't sufficient for me to identify a specific cause. I don't think there is much I can do about this because MinimServer is limited to using the directory scanning APIs that Java provides. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Network absolute path - wallydaw - 13-01-2016, 14:33
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 13-01-2016, 23:26
RE: Network absolute path - wallydaw - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 14-01-2016, 19:26
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 14-01-2016, 22:48
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016, 23:04
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 10:34
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 15-01-2016 11:00
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 16:26
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



