|
Network absolute path
|
|
14-01-2016, 23:04
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Network absolute path
(14-01-2016 22:48)DavidL Wrote: Unusual but I need to disagree with Simon. The issue with a network-attached NAS isn't data transfer rate. It's rescanning performance, which could be 5x or 10x worse than a USB-attached drive. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Network absolute path - wallydaw - 13-01-2016, 14:33
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 13-01-2016, 23:26
RE: Network absolute path - wallydaw - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 14-01-2016, 19:26
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 14-01-2016, 22:48
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016 23:04
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 10:34
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 15-01-2016, 11:00
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 16:26
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



