Post Reply 
Network absolute path
14-01-2016, 23:04
Post: #7
RE: Network absolute path
(14-01-2016 22:48)DavidL Wrote:  Unusual but I need to disagree with Simon.

While a direct-coupled USB hard disc will give a higher data transfer rate than a network NAS, this is largely irrelevant for streaming music files because the data transfer rates required are relatively low compared with (for example) streaming video. Even if your library consists entirely of 24 bit / 192 kHz uncompressed audio the data transfer rate required will be far less than if you streamed normal HD video. Hence I agree with tboooe.

Perhaps I should add that if your NAS is regularly accessed by several users streaming music and video you may well hit data transfer problems, but this setup is very different from a single-user USB hard disc.

The issue with a network-attached NAS isn't data transfer rate. It's rescanning performance, which could be 5x or 10x worse than a USB-attached drive.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Network absolute path - wallydaw - 13-01-2016, 14:33
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 13-01-2016, 23:26
RE: Network absolute path - wallydaw - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016, 18:59
RE: Network absolute path - tboooe - 14-01-2016, 19:26
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 14-01-2016, 22:48
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 14-01-2016 23:04
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 10:34
RE: Network absolute path - simoncn - 15-01-2016, 11:00
RE: Network absolute path - DavidL - 15-01-2016, 16:26

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)