Post Reply 
transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176
02-11-2015, 21:49 (This post was last modified: 02-11-2015 23:13 by simoncn.)
Post: #6
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176
(02-11-2015 21:06)Mihaylov Wrote:  And what there was media server? Melco or another NAS?
What differences in a sound of three options? How big difference in a sound?

The server was my Windows laptop. Transcoding DSF to WAV in real time requires quite a powerful CPU.

2) and 3) were fairly similar and 1) was considerably better.

Murrays on the Linn forum has suggested that an offline conversion from DSF to WAV would be better than real-time transcoding. This sounds plausible but I haven't tried it myself.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - simoncn - 02-11-2015 21:49

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)