|
transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176
|
|
01-11-2015, 00:25
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176
I compared playing the same DSF file using these transcoding settings:
1) dsf:dopwav 2) dsf:wav 3) dsf:wav24;176 The best was 1) followed by 2) then 3). The renderer was a Melco N1A connected via USB to a Chord Hugo TT. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - Andre Gosselin - 31-10-2015, 17:27
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - simoncn - 31-10-2015, 20:31
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - simoncn - 01-11-2015 00:25
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - Andre Gosselin - 01-11-2015, 16:37
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - Mihaylov - 02-11-2015, 21:06
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - simoncn - 02-11-2015, 21:49
RE: transcoding using dsf:wav;176 vs dsf:wav24;176 - Mihaylov - 03-11-2015, 08:39
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



