Post Reply 
Sound quality comparison
01-09-2014, 08:31
Post: #48
RE: Sound quality comparison
(01-09-2014 01:25)krutsch Wrote:  it's the first part that I bolded above. I want transcoding to wav24 when accessed locally (i.e. using a local 192.168.1.xx) address, which means addressing the local MinimServer directly, as opposed to proxying through BubbleUPnP server.

When I am traveling or at work, I am playing back on an Android device that really only wants 16 CD/CD+ audio (i.e. 16/44.1 or 16/48). My Android devices can play wav24, just fine, but it's a lot more data to send over the Internet to just have the phone truncate the least significant bits on playback (or worse, down-sample the high-res stuff, which is very CPU intensive on the phone).

I can do all of this using MinimStream, alone, I think, but then I need to reconfigure stream.transcode options when I am at home or at work/on the road.

Thanks! I understand the scenario now and I will think about how it could be supported better by a future release of MinimServer and MinimStreamer.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Sound quality comparison - best - 22-08-2014, 09:14
RE: Sound quality comparison - best - 25-08-2014, 09:08
RE: Sound quality comparison - JimR - 25-08-2014, 12:09
RE: Sound quality comparison - simoncn - 01-09-2014 08:31

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)