Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
|
23-06-2014, 19:06
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values:
HD, CD+, CD, CD-, LC. What is the difference between HD and CD+ ? What is CD- ? Regards Rainer |
|||
23-06-2014, 20:44
(This post was last modified: 23-06-2014 20:44 by simoncn.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(23-06-2014 19:06)bruemmer Wrote: I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values: HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better CD+ is lossless and better than 16/44100 CD is lossless and exactly 16/44100 CD- is lossless and worse than 16/44100 LC is lossy compression |
|||
31-08-2014, 17:46
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote:(23-06-2014 19:06)bruemmer Wrote: I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values: Is it possible to merge the CD+ and HD categories? |
|||
31-08-2014, 18:27
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 17:46)Mike1878 Wrote:(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote: HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better I don't think 16/48000 should be in the same category as 24/192000. |
|||
31-08-2014, 19:12
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 18:27)simoncn Wrote:(31-08-2014 17:46)Mike1878 Wrote:(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote: HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better Neither do I but I would class all 24bit audio as HD. Is there a way to customize this? |
|||
31-08-2014, 20:21
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 19:12)Mike1878 Wrote: Neither do I but I would class all 24bit audio as HD. Is there a way to customize this? The categories are not customizable. I think it might be reasonable to put all 24-bit files (44.1 kHz and above) into the HD category. This would leave 16/48000, 20/44100 and 16/88200 (etc.) in the CD+ category. What do other users think about this change? |
|||
31-08-2014, 20:59
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality | |||
31-08-2014, 23:18
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 20:59)krutsch Wrote:simoncn daflace='1409512914' Wrote: I think it might be reasonable to put all 24-bit files (44.1 kHz and above) into the HD category. It's a yes from me of course. Or maybe there is a way to show a difference between flac 16 and 24 bit under the audio format option. |
|||
31-08-2014, 23:47
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 23:18)Mike1878 Wrote: It's a yes from me of course. Or maybe there is a way to show a difference between flac 16 and 24 bit under the audio format option. Changing the bit depth or sample rate doesn't change the audio format, so it wouldn't be appropriate to add this information to the #AudioFormat index. |
|||
05-09-2014, 04:23
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
Hello. I have a question, in which category would a DSD (DSF) file show up? i.e. DSD64 and DSD128? Would they show up in HD?
Thanks. Barr |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)