Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
23-06-2014, 19:06
Post: #1
Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values:
HD, CD+, CD, CD-, LC.

What is the difference between HD and CD+ ?
What is CD- ?

Regards Rainer
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
23-06-2014, 20:44 (This post was last modified: 23-06-2014 20:44 by simoncn.)
Post: #2
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(23-06-2014 19:06)bruemmer Wrote:  I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values:
HD, CD+, CD, CD-, LC.

What is the difference between HD and CD+ ?
What is CD- ?

Regards Rainer

HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better
CD+ is lossless and better than 16/44100
CD is lossless and exactly 16/44100
CD- is lossless and worse than 16/44100
LC is lossy compression
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 17:46
Post: #3
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote:  
(23-06-2014 19:06)bruemmer Wrote:  I want to use this tag but am not shure what's behindert the values:
HD, CD+, CD, CD-, LC.

What is the difference between HD and CD+ ?
What is CD- ?

Regards Rainer

HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better
CD+ is lossless and better than 16/44100
CD is lossless and exactly 16/44100
CD- is lossless and worse than 16/44100
LC is lossy compression

Is it possible to merge the CD+ and HD categories?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 18:27
Post: #4
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 17:46)Mike1878 Wrote:  
(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote:  HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better
CD+ is lossless and better than 16/44100
CD is lossless and exactly 16/44100
CD- is lossless and worse than 16/44100
LC is lossy compression

Is it possible to merge the CD+ and HD categories?

I don't think 16/48000 should be in the same category as 24/192000.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 19:12
Post: #5
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 18:27)simoncn Wrote:  
(31-08-2014 17:46)Mike1878 Wrote:  
(23-06-2014 20:44)simoncn Wrote:  HD is lossless and 24/88200 or better
CD+ is lossless and better than 16/44100
CD is lossless and exactly 16/44100
CD- is lossless and worse than 16/44100
LC is lossy compression

Is it possible to merge the CD+ and HD categories?

I don't think 16/48000 should be in the same category as 24/192000.

Neither do I but I would class all 24bit audio as HD. Is there a way to customize this?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 20:21
Post: #6
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 19:12)Mike1878 Wrote:  Neither do I but I would class all 24bit audio as HD. Is there a way to customize this?

The categories are not customizable.

I think it might be reasonable to put all 24-bit files (44.1 kHz and above) into the HD category.

This would leave 16/48000, 20/44100 and 16/88200 (etc.) in the CD+ category.

What do other users think about this change?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 20:59
Post: #7
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 20:21)simoncn Wrote:  I think it might be reasonable to put all 24-bit files (44.1 kHz and above) into the HD category.

This would leave 16/48000, 20/44100 and 16/88200 (etc.) in the CD+ category.

What do other users think about this change?

+1 ... I vote: yes.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 23:18
Post: #8
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 20:59)krutsch Wrote:  
simoncn daflace='1409512914' Wrote:  I think it might be reasonable to put all 24-bit files (44.1 kHz and above) into the HD category.

This would leave 16/48000, 20/44100 and 16/88200 (etc.) in the CD+ category.

What do other users think about this change?

+1 ... I vote: yes.

It's a yes from me of course. Or maybe there is a way to show a difference between flac 16 and 24 bit under the audio format option.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2014, 23:47
Post: #9
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
(31-08-2014 23:18)Mike1878 Wrote:  It's a yes from me of course. Or maybe there is a way to show a difference between flac 16 and 24 bit under the audio format option.

Changing the bit depth or sample rate doesn't change the audio format, so it wouldn't be appropriate to add this information to the #AudioFormat index.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-09-2014, 04:23
Post: #10
RE: Special Index Tag #AudioQuality
Hello. I have a question, in which category would a DSD (DSF) file show up? i.e. DSD64 and DSD128? Would they show up in HD?

Thanks.

Barr
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)